Nissan Urvan

Neck, chest and leg protection were weak. The vehicle was awarded a default score of 16 out of 16 in the side impact crash test. However, the low offset score meant that the vehicle was limited to a 1 star rating and an overall score of 8.49 (the maximum available for a 1 star rating). Frontal Offset Crash Test Body region scores out of 4 points each: Head/neck zero pts, chest 0.37 pts, upper legs 0.95 pts, lower legs/feet zero pts. The passenger compartment lost structural integrity in the offset crash test. The brake pedal moved rearwards by 367 mm and upwards 206 mm, to a position where it posed a hazard to the groin of the dummy. The steering wheel hub moved 11 mm rearward, 191 mm upward and 3 mm sideways. The front ("A") pillar moved 143 mm rearwards. All doors remained closed during the crash. After the crash tools were required to open the drivers door. The dummy's left foot was trapped by the deformed footwell and the dummy leg was dismantled for extrication. There was a leak from the diesel fuel tank. The top of the tank had been speared by the front suspension torsion bar which displaced rearwards in the crash. Due to steering column movement, the airbag tended to deploy upwards. The airbag partly deployed under the <b>...</b>

Good Good Acceptable Acceptable Marginal Marginal Poor Poor Test details: The Ford Mustang was re-engineered and restyled for the 2010 model year. Two tests of a 2010 Mustang convertible were conducted. In the first test, forces recorded on the dummy's neck were high, leading to a poor head/neck injury rating and a poor overall rating. In response, Ford modified the convertible's front structure and the doors to improve occupant protection in frontal offset crashes begining with cars manufactured after December 2009 (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door). In the second test of a car built after the structural modifications were in place, the head/neck and overall ratings improved to good. Restraints/dummy kinematics ? Dummy movement was well controlled. The driver side airbag deployed during the crash. After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, its head contacted the side airbag. Injury measures ? Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Ford <b>...</b>

this is out of a 1989 terrano.